On 27/12/2007, Jonathan (Wikipedia)
<jonathan.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Majorly wrote:
On 27/12/2007, Jonathan (Wikipedia)
<jonathan.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, there were a total of *79* de-sysoppings this year. I understand
> three were because of compromising, and several were voluntary, but
>
this
> is pitiful, and *we can do better*. If people
on here want to be danged
> drama queens, they should just take it to email with the users
>
involved.
This,
again, is pitiful. We've got to stop acting like this and BUILD
THE ENCYCLOPEDIA. Thank you.
~Jonathan
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
How many of those were because of bad admins though? Sometimes, an admin
needs a break from seeing extra buttons they no longer want to be
dealing
with, so will request to be desysopped. I
don't see that as a problem.
Bad admins of course are a problem, and so are compromised accounts.
Less of
that next year of course, but admins can resign
whenever they wish - it
isn't a problem at all.
Of course I understand the compromising and the bad admins, but that is
just about half of the total of de-sysoppings. Abut 25% were the user
being tired of it, and the rest was pure drama, which is why I think
this is pitiful.
~Jonathan
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Admins are allowed to get tired of it. They aren't forced to do anything. It
can be very stressful.