I don't know, whats worrying? You seem to think the drama seekers are a problem - I don't know who the drama seekers are, but is it possible some of them are the ones who are leaving? Perhaps the sudden increase (as you see it) in desysoppings will help to counteract the drama that you dislike.
On Dec 27, 2007 7:07 PM, Jonathan (Wikipedia) jonathan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
AGK wrote:
Similarly, nothing new. Wikipedia's expanding, so is the number of desysoppings. We've got better things to worry about, surely. AGK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AGK en.wikipedia.org
On 27/12/2007, Rjd0060 - rjd0060.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Well said. And guess what: Next year, there will probably be more than there were this year, and so on. Nothing alarming here, really.
On Dec 27, 2007 3:55 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/27/07, Jonathan (Wikipedia) jonathan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Majorly wrote:
How many of those were because of bad admins though? Sometimes, an
admin
needs a break from seeing extra buttons they no longer want to be
dealing
with, so will request to be desysopped. I don't see that as a
problem.
Bad admins of course are a problem, and so are compromised accounts.
Less of
that next year of course, but admins can resign whenever they wish -
it
isn't a problem at all.
Yes, but this is more than we've ever had. I know that Wikipedia has some admins retire, but we had more than last year. I'm not trying to alarm everyone, but this is scaring me just a bit. I've seen a few retirements because of a problem with another editor. THAT is what I'm saying we need to get our act together about.
~Jonathan
Of course there were more than ever before. There are more admins than ever before. There are more articles than ever before. There were more
edits
than ever before. One must have a sense of proportion here. What * percentage* of admins was desysopped year over year, by reason for desysopping? That would give us a reasonable comparison point, raw numbers are meaningless.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Rjd0060 rjd0060.wiki@gmail.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Yes, I understand that Wikipedia gets more admins with time. But this year had a massive jump in desysops. THAT'S why I'm getting worried.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l