On Dec 16, 2007 12:29 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 16/12/2007, joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu
<joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
That's true. The sample size is very small.
But considering that one argument
made in favor of spoiler removal was that the spoiler-removal was favored by
the public this preliminary data doesn't seem to back that up at all and if
anything shows the other direction.
I don't recall that argument being raised ... I removed them from any
section headed "Plot summary" or equivalent as being redundant and
silly. "Plot summary contains plot summary!" (Sounds like a lolcat.)
Luk, iz it cn I B yr fathr? LOL!