On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Matthew Brown wrote:
That works only for !!, not for future recurrences of the same situation involving other users. !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
I recall !! was unblocked significantly before that email was posted -
That's "not convicted", it isn't "conclusively demonstrated the innocence of".