On Dec 10, 2007 3:49 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/07, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
Relata Refero wrote:
The cyberstalking list saw the !! email, which contained a vast error of judgment, namely the implication that an obvious returning account was a disruptive returning account; that error of judgment was unchecked, in that nobody appeared to correct it prior to an (undiscussed on-list) block; the list appears to contain several respected editors.
The cyberstalking list was not a secret list, but a private list.
<snip>
Consulting privately with your friends is a *good thing*.
--Jimbo
Well, Jimbo...the fact that this particular block was discussed on the cyberstalking and harassment list is indeed significant to the person who was being blocked.
As has been said repeatedly, "discussed" on the list is an inaccurate description of the actual events.
"Was mentioned in passing and generated no followup emails" is what people are describing.
The blockee is now forever besmirched by the fact that having his name mentioned on that list has inappropriately associated him with such vile activities.
I think it's been rather conclusively demonstrated that !! was not who Durova thought they were, and that no suspicion should remain attached to the account.
This horse is fossilized. Stop kicking it.