Quoting David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
On 10/12/2007, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
That would be because he is a sociopathic liar.
Right. So why the hell are we trying to accommodate him?
When and where it would make sense to do so for nice people too, in terms of our basic content rules. We can do inadvertent but real harm when a questionable-quality Wikipedia article is the first Google hit on someone's name. So single-issue bios tend to be named after the incident rather than the person.
But we've been over this before. Brandt isn't a single issue person, we have at least 4 separate "issues" (one of which the CIA Cookie matter wasn't able to survive on its own, in part because it had to do with Brandt.). And there's not hing of questionable quality in the PIR article. BLP doesn't allow deletions simply to harm our own google rankings. It doesn't work that way.