Quoting David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 10/12/2007, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/12/2007, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> That would be because he is a sociopathic
liar.
Right.
So why the hell are we trying to accommodate him?
When and where it would make sense to do so for nice people too, in
terms of our basic content rules. We can do inadvertent but real harm
when a questionable-quality Wikipedia article is the first Google hit
on someone's name. So single-issue bios tend to be named after the
incident rather than the person.
But we've been over this before. Brandt isn't a single issue person, we
have at
least 4 separate "issues" (one of which the CIA Cookie matter wasn't able
to
survive on its own, in part because it had to do with Brandt.). And
there's not
hing of questionable quality in the PIR article. BLP doesn't allow deletions
simply to harm our own google rankings. It doesn't work that way.