Michael Noda wrote:
Lots of WP regulars are over there now, but they're mostly getting torn to pieces, because their arguments do boil down to "Bagley's a sociopath, and you need to trust us on that." Virtually nobody is backing themselves up with links, like http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=382783&cid=21613811 does. Seriously, folks, it's not just on-wiki that we need to cite our sources, especially with the PR we've had this last week or two. *Not* making our critics right about our being arrogant and unsocialized would be a good thing.
This is why I was suggesting that it'd be really useful to have a page providing a full account of the situation. Producing a neutral, verifiable summaries of persons or events is what we're _for_.