On 05/12/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
And in this case there was no "secret body" that "determine[d] cases", so "authority" was irrelevant. Odd how your comments were based on the false presumption that has been repudiated so often in the past few days. It's clear that my last comment to you about having a perfect record of assuming bad faith still applies.
If you are going to keep trying to play the plausible denyability card it is to be expected that people are going to start opting for collective responsibility.