On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:19:12 +0000, Kwan Ting Chan ktc@ktchan.info wrote:
That Durova's judgment was badly out is not in dispute; why look for any other explanation?
You can't just brush aside people desire to check there isn't another, the actually correct, explanation as sometimes god forbid what we're told isn't necessarily the truth.
Riiiiight. So assume bad faith in spite of all assertions to the contrary. I wonder why that didn't occur to me?
Convince people why the explanation given is the true one, and that that one isn't trying to hide something. Just brushing away queries is only going to lead to suspicions that something is being hidden and that they should try even harder to look for a different explanation.
You can't convince them because it requires proof of a negative.
Explanations have been given, and the only reason you are still asking this is because you refuse to accept those explanations. And somehow this is my problem?
Guy (JzG)