On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 07:53:42 -0500, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Durova said quite clearly on wikipedia that the response from the 5 ranged from possitive to entheusiastic.
Durova also said there was enough evidence to block. I wonder why people seem so keen to believe one thing Durova said and not the other?
Well, she admitted to being wrong about one, but has remained silent about the other.
So maybe people are demanding the wrong thing? I think we can safely say that Durova got this pretty spectacularly wrong, so assuming in the face of multiple calls of "not me, guv" that she was right to interpret whatever responses she got, in the way she did, is probably a mistake.
Guy (JzG)