On 8/24/07, Eugene van der Pijll eugene@vanderpijll.nl wrote:
He's also completely right.
No, not in the slightest. He's proposed a hierarchy of ridiculous and strained interpretations which exceed the boundaries of rational thought, and which deserved no response. I'm sorry you were suckered by it.
If you define a "Document" to mean a single page of Wikipedia,
The document is an article. It spans multiple http fetched pages. There is nothing surprising about this.
There certainly are some things which are not clear because they are so far outside of the scope of the language of the license, but thats not the case for anything mentioned here.