So, basically, we want people reusing our content to show some sign that they are attempting in good faith to comply with the license, even if they don't quite dot the i's and cross the t's in a manner that can't be nitpicked to death by a lawyer. Perhaps we should have, somewhere prominently linked from our copyright license page, some plain-English non-lawyerese explanation of the bare minimum that would be needed by a reuser to show such good faith and not be ridiculed by us (even if we're not generally inclined to sue).
That is exactly what I'm saying, yes, but that's just me. It's not, and can't be, an official position. The official position is that you have to do what the license says, and that's all the official position can ever be, since that's what the law says. I think we have (although I've no idea where) instructions on how to comply with the GFDL, written in as plain English as possible. While we won't generally enforce the license to the letter, we can't say that officially or we are effectively changing the license (and we'd need the permission of pretty much everyone that has ever contributed in order to do that).