On 8/15/07, Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.org wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
It would have been simpler if he used the static HTML dump instead of the XML. It's not hard to make a desktop reader out of it. I wrote a proof of concept a while back.
Unless I'm reading your idea incorrectly, the static HTML dump seems to be about 4 times as large and in 7zip format instead of bzip2.
Got a link to your proof of concept?