On 13/08/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/08/07, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.net wrote:
Could you be referring to David's own post of 8/3/07, subj: Moving Forward in which he said: "BTW, I assume some checkusers have looked over the harassing edits (the less than innocent variety of query). If any of them would like to but feel they shouldn't be the one to, email me or checkuser-l.
checkuser-l is for discussing results one doesn't understand or suggesting others run a check one considers one shouldn't. Where's the privacy violation? Please show your working when answering.
Or, for the real point of the thread, the expectations violation. Again, please show working, because it will be closely questioned.
- d.