On 8/12/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I still feel banned. There is more than one option available to unblock individual Tor users.
Allowing individual Tor users to edit Wikipedia involves adding a line to LocalSettings.php and having a Steward give you the permission. It's easy. But why would we do that? We don't allow people to edit through anonymous proxies (and there is no consensus that Tor nodes are not anonymous proxies - I, for one, certainly don't see any significant difference) for a reason.
I love how the word consensus gets thrown around willy-nilly to argue any point at all. There is no consensus that Tor nodes *are* anonymous proxies either.
Of course, that's pretty irrelevant, since AB isn't *intentionally* being blocked because s/he edits through Tor, rather the fact that s/he is blocked is a side effect (which, incidentally, is why I don't think it's accurate to say that AB is banned).
That reasons applies to you just as it applies to anyone else. If there is a reason to make an exception for you, then there is a reason to make an exception for pretty much anyone, in which case we should simply remove the rule.
That's absolutely not true, though. AB has made thousands of edits to Wikipedia, over a course of over a year. It's safe to say this isn't just a throwaway account being made to do some vandalism and run. The majority of people who commented on this users request for adminship supported it, and even some of those who didn't support it mentioned that they would be supportive of allowing the user to edit through Tor. That isn't the case for all users, and that's why simply "removing the rule" is not acceptable.