On 11/08/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/08/07, Armed Blowfish diodontida.armata@googlemail.com wrote:
But those things were bad for me? And isn't a block upgraded to a ban when the community denies an appeal?
TOR IPs are pretty much banned.
User:Armed Blowfish is not.
If all TOR users were like User:Armed Blowfish, TOR IPs wouldn't be blocked.
Or, to be specific, if all Tor users were like the way Armed Blowfish *used* to be. (I've changed.)
You choosing to use only blocked methods to access Wikipedia is not enough reason to unblock TOR IPs, sadly.
I never asked for Tor IPs to be unblocked, I just asked for ipblock-exempt.
Really, I'm over wanting to edit... but it would have been good if more people had been kind about the whole thing.
Deliberately using jargon terms with your own private meanings is unlikely to lead to either effective communication or people assuming good faith in you when they realise you've been doing it.
- d.
But that isn't what I've been doing?
Armed Blowfish