Perhaps you are thinking about her many archives? It would be crazy to
remove that much of someone's contribution history for any reason. The devs
would absolutely throw a fit! :-P
On 8/6/07, Raphael Wegmann <wegmann(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:06:39PM +0100, ElinorD wrote:
On 8/6/07, Raphael Wegmann
<wegmann(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:51:19PM -0700, Durova wrote:
> > Re: "BTW, I think there's a slight inaccuracy in your recollection.
I
> don't
> > think the common argument was that she was hurting the project by
> > getting outed, I think it was that the project was being hurt by the
> > attempts to continue covering her identity up afterward. SlimVirgin
> > herself wasn't actually involved with that as far as I'm aware."
> >
> > I did a bit of refactoring myself on that, and for the record SV
didn't
> ask
> > me to. That was based purely upon my reading of policy and
arbitration
> > precedents, in which only
self-disclosures of an editor's identity
may
be
repeated by others onsite.
I would define self-disclosure as revealing personal information
by the users own contributions. Therefore I still wonder, why all
(exept for the last 500) contributions of SlimVirgin have been removed
from her contribution history.
br
--
Raphael
They haven't been. This
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin
goes back thousands and thousands of edits. I got bored clicking on
"next
500" so many times.
Well, they have been removed, but someone obviously restored the history.
br
--
Raphael
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.