Perhaps you are thinking about her many archives? It would be crazy to remove that much of someone's contribution history for any reason. The devs would absolutely throw a fit! :-P
On 8/6/07, Raphael Wegmann wegmann@psi.co.at wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:06:39PM +0100, ElinorD wrote:
On 8/6/07, Raphael Wegmann wegmann@psi.co.at wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:51:19PM -0700, Durova wrote:
Re: "BTW, I think there's a slight inaccuracy in your recollection.
I
don't
think the common argument was that she was hurting the project by getting outed, I think it was that the project was being hurt by the attempts to continue covering her identity up afterward. SlimVirgin herself wasn't actually involved with that as far as I'm aware."
I did a bit of refactoring myself on that, and for the record SV
didn't
ask
me to. That was based purely upon my reading of policy and
arbitration
precedents, in which only self-disclosures of an editor's identity
may
be
repeated by others onsite.
I would define self-disclosure as revealing personal information by the users own contributions. Therefore I still wonder, why all (exept for the last 500) contributions of SlimVirgin have been removed from her contribution history.
br
Raphael
They haven't been. This
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin
goes back thousands and thousands of edits. I got bored clicking on
"next
500" so many times.
Well, they have been removed, but someone obviously restored the history.
br
Raphael
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l