From the acknowledgements section (yes, there is one)
on Kuru:
This article was adapted with permission from a report "Kuru: The Dynamics
of a Prion Disease", authored by Stacy McGrath.
notes on medical virology- Timbury
Both out of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease) and annoying as hell
to track down specific revisions, except in this case, because the
copyrighted text is the base for the whole damn article. Literally the first
edit, and its stuck around since 2004. The timbury one can just be wiped,
he's a user who contributed it under the GFDL, the report one is more
troublesome, did she give permission for GFDL, or just wikipedia? its
non-free if its just permission for us. This needs some fixing, probably
some oversight as well.
Any thoughts on someone coming up with a method to identify and flag or
template articles to be reviewed that have an acknowledgement section,
something used 'with permission' or copyright notices?
--
-Brock