On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, K P wrote:
Can someone please link directly to a current Wikipedia article, that should be changed, and list a proper reference to it that is not being used, to show the damage being done by this fracas to Wikipedia? Just one example of a specific article, and what should be in it, according to a highly reliable source--not a dozen, just one.
Like the generalized attack sites version, the harm caused by this is mostly in the discussion pages, not in the article pages. I hope you are not claiming that unless it's directly deleted from an article page, it isn't damage.
I can't claim anything without any basis for understanding, and since there doesn't seem to be any forthcoming that is a civil presentation of just what has been done, I'm not claiming anything.
But I don't see how you went from the question I asked to what my claims might or might not be.
I thought it was fairly straightforward: "I won't believe in damage unless you show me an article that was damaged by removing a reference."
"I hope you don't mean that the only kind of damage is in articles."