On Aug 2, 2007, at 12:10 AM, Bryan Derksen wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
I think that sums up my feelings on this matter, too. I just cannot understand why Slim Virgin is being described as "a net detriment to the project" on account of attacks that are made by *her* by people we all recognise as either severely unbalanced or having an axe to grind. It quite disturbing.
It's not SlimVirgin herself that I consider a net detriment, it's all this effort to suppress discussion of her. If she herself is not involved in that (and I'm led to believe that she's not) then I've got no beef at all with her on this matter.
BTW, first there was a comparison to appeasing the Nazis, now we've got a comparison to rape. This is a bit over the top, IMO.
It's a magical ritual to invoke the deity Godwin.
It's not working. :(
-Phil