On 8/2/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
I think that sums up my feelings on this matter, too. I just cannot understand why Slim Virgin is being described as "a net detriment to the project" on account of attacks that are made by *her* by people we all recognise as either severely unbalanced or having an axe to grind. It quite disturbing.
It's not SlimVirgin herself that I consider a net detriment, it's all this effort to suppress discussion of her.
All what "effort"? And when did this become the wikislimvirgin-l discussion list anyway?
If she herself is not involved in that (and I'm led to believe that she's not) then I've got no beef at all with her on this matter.
So when Andrew was asking her (and apparently others) to leave, and using the word "we", he was just speaking for himself?
BTW, first there was a comparison to appeasing the Nazis, now we've got a comparison to rape. This is a bit over the top, IMO.
This whole discussion is a bit over the top, including the bit about "censorship".