daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
Still, do we want to open the door to these kinds of articles? Criticisms of Sylvia Browne could lead to Criticisms of Uri Geller to Criticisms of George Bush to Criticisms of Tom Cruise to Criticisms of [pick your favorite]. The very hypothesis of the article is POV. Surely, this is not what we are here for.
If the articles are already long, then these seem completely valid - after all, there's no undue weight situation if we've got significant coverage in other areas, right? I hope that BLP wasn't designed to remove valid sub-articles like this.
I'd really like some input. Ideally, it should be merged, but the precedent this poses should also be mentioned.
Best-case scenario is yes, merge. Obviously, a "criticism of GWB" article that may exist is going to have difficulty being merged when the main article is already 70kb long, but there's no reason not to take this on a case by case basis, assuming good sourcing.
-Jeff