Jeff Raymond wrote:
doc wrote:
Which raises the question: if all we have is information about one incident, why the subject of our article isn't the incident itself rather than the person as a distinct individual?
Biography means a writing about someone's *life*.
If we don't have material for a biography, then we shouldn't have a biography!
Well, technically, we should have them on both. I'm wondering if calling the articles biographies are part of the problem.
-Jeff
Why on earth would we want a record of the incident twice?
Doc