On 4/22/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com wrote:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Isn't removing unsourced material already allowed through BLP rules?
Certainly. But this is the first large-scale effort at identifying the problem bios.
So let's identify problem bios.
I don't think notability has any bearing on how susceptible an article for BLP issues. Some random thoughts: 1. How much negative material does it contain? 2. How much of that material is posted by one person? 3. Is it balanced with basic biographical information? 4. Is it based on one negative incident? All that brings me too is that problem articles have tone and POV issues. If 4 is the case, it probably won't survive AFD (Barbara Bauer didn't despite valiant sourcing). We could address POV in an article RFC. Any other ideas?