when someone says that the process is abused because theres no rule against it, the implication is that its not addressed. It's akin to me saying 'Theres no rule that says you have to put POV into articles'.
I disagree with that implication. "No rule against" means "No rule against". No more, no less. The policy only says what you are allowed to do in order to avoid possible confusion with people assuming that you aren't allowed to do it. Removing the positive parts of the policy would not make any substantial difference.