when someone says that the process is abused because
theres no rule against
it, the implication is that its not addressed. It's akin to me saying
'Theres no rule that says you have to put POV into articles'.
I disagree with that implication. "No rule against" means "No rule
against". No more, no less. The policy only says what you are allowed
to do in order to avoid possible confusion with people assuming that
you aren't allowed to do it. Removing the positive parts of the policy
would not make any substantial difference.