On 4/19/07, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com> wrote:
<snip>
Thanks for the thoughtful answers, Jimmy. Maybe it would put this to rest
for many if the unspoken questions are asked again/answered by you directly
(and as alluded to by Tony, directing us to Brandt's letter):
1. What role does his stated/pending legal threat play in this?
2. Is this being done to try to protect the untested Section 230 coverage?
3. Are you willing to disclose the current "back room" status of your
communications with Brandt (if any), for full disclosure, so no one is
caught by surprise that may interact there? Are you willing to confirm if
such exist so that people know the scale/importance of this, if it's more
than just trying to be nice?