On 19/04/07, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
I'm fine with him being unblocked on a practical
standpoint, just *not
this way*. It's a betrayal of trust of the community due to Brandt's
alleged off-wiki activity and doesn't reflect overwhelming community
consensus on the matter, a consensus that was reached days ago, not months
or even years. These things matter, and, frankly, if it were someone who
isn't Jimbo who did the unblocking, they'd likely have been trotted in
front of ArbCom by now.
I suspect the ArbCom would have said "so what's the damage done by the
unblocked account?"
So far would it happen to be ... zero?
- d.