On 4/17/07, Kurt Jansson jansson@gmx.net wrote:
Obviously I would like you to answer my questions the wiki way: You may edit the existing answers that are already there, but try to find consensual answers that the core community can agree on. If there are controversial points of view: say so, elaborate on them and point out if one of them represents the majority's opinion.
Hi Kurt :-)
I'm a bit confused about the answering of your questions. Do you want individuals to answer from their own perspective, or from a kind of "neutral point of view"? Are people to edit others' answers to better reflect their own opinions? Or should people answer individually, while perhaps commenting on others' answers?
I'm really just raising this out of interest, and for the benefit of participants in your study - I don't think I can really speak with much experience any more on the workings of the English Wikipedia. :-(
All the best,
Cormac