On 4/17/07, Kurt Jansson <jansson(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Obviously I would like you to answer my questions the
wiki way: You may edit the
existing answers that are already there, but try to find consensual answers that
the core community can agree on. If there are controversial points of view: say
so, elaborate on them and point out if one of them represents the majority's
opinion.
Hi Kurt :-)
I'm a bit confused about the answering of your questions. Do you want
individuals to answer from their own perspective, or from a kind of
"neutral point of view"? Are people to edit others' answers to better
reflect their own opinions? Or should people answer individually,
while perhaps commenting on others' answers?
I'm really just raising this out of interest, and for the benefit of
participants in your study - I don't think I can really speak with
much experience any more on the workings of the English Wikipedia. :-(
All the best,
Cormac