On 4/17/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Stephen Bain
<stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Merging the methods article into the main article
on suicide is the
best course, in my view, since it would go a long way to providing the
necessary context.
No it is too big to merge. Please stop trying to enforce your moral
standards on other people.
I didn't suggest deleting any informative content, as you seem to
imply, I merely suggested that having it all dumped into its own
article is not making the best place for it.
The recommended sizes for articles should not be governing our
decisions about what is the best way to present our content. We
wouldn't refrain from including a significant point of view in an
article just because the article was too long, to give an extreme
example.
I would also appreciate it if you could either address my argument (a
merger would allow the information to be fully and completely
presented, but with appropriate context) or provide some arguments of
your own, without resorting to epithets.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com