On 4/17/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/17/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
Merging the methods article into the main article on suicide is the best course, in my view, since it would go a long way to providing the necessary context.
No it is too big to merge. Please stop trying to enforce your moral standards on other people.
I didn't suggest deleting any informative content, as you seem to imply, I merely suggested that having it all dumped into its own article is not making the best place for it.
The recommended sizes for articles should not be governing our decisions about what is the best way to present our content. We wouldn't refrain from including a significant point of view in an article just because the article was too long, to give an extreme example.
I would also appreciate it if you could either address my argument (a merger would allow the information to be fully and completely presented, but with appropriate context) or provide some arguments of your own, without resorting to epithets.