On 4/16/07, Eugene van der Pijll <eugene(a)vanderpijll.nl> wrote:
If you feel the article is unmaintainable without
protecting it, why do
you propose to *delete* it? A more logical (and acceptable) choice would
be to protect it.
I think he is referring to the fact that WP shouldn't advice people on
suicide, not that it is a target for vandals.
I think that if we would only go by the editorial principle this
article should stay (should we also remove the section in
[[Nitroglycerin]] where it states how it is manufactured?), but I
think as a human being that it is unacceptable for this article to
exist. This is EXACTLY why IAR is there. If you do decide to delete
it, I will sign your response in the (inevitable) RFC that follows.
--Oskar