So, what are you saying, that you disagree with the
arb com decision?
If so, hey, I do too, but as long as people are getting desysopped for
restoring controversial out-of-process speedy deletions I think you're
going to have a tough time convincing admins to do so without a
deletion review.
Just as there is a difference between reverting an edit to an article
and edit warring, there is a difference between undeleting an article
that's just been deleted and wheel warring. From my memory of the
arbcom decision, only admins which deleted or undeleted more than once
were desysoped.