On 15/04/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Given the number of de-facto inactive admins we
already have I don't
see much benefit in that approach.
1. It would reduce the harmfulness to the community of the present RFA.
2. "De-facto inactive admins" do not harm the project.
I have never understood why Geni considers "paper admins" (a phrase he
has used a number of times since I've been reading this list) to be
harmful. Geni, would you care to explain?
--
Earle Martin