On 15/04/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/04/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Given the number of de-facto inactive admins we already have I don't see much benefit in that approach.
- It would reduce the harmfulness to the community of the present RFA.
- "De-facto inactive admins" do not harm the project.
I have never understood why Geni considers "paper admins" (a phrase he has used a number of times since I've been reading this list) to be harmful. Geni, would you care to explain?