On 4/11/07, gjzilla@gmail.com gjzilla@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/11/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 gjzilla@gmail.com wrote:
The reason that they don't discount useless support votes is because
the
main purpose of RfA is to see whether we trust the user in question
with
the
tools. The default option is "support", but you must have a good
reason
to
oppose.
Does every opponent have to have a *different* good reason?
If not, then an "oppose" without details could easily mean "I agree with the reasons other people have given" and should be legitimate.
Well, yes but one should write "Oppose per UserX" for example.
Another thing is that I think most of the discounted votes were along the lines of "Oppose because he implemented [[WP:OFFICE]] which is EVIL".
Johnleemk