On 8 Apr 2007 at 15:38, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
the article it's in. Wikipedia Review most likely does not have relevance to any article except maybe [[en:Daniel Brandt]]; whether it should be linked there or not is a content decision based on its notability. But a blanket ban on links to "attack sites" is silly, even if we could define what that meant.
Not to mention that, since the (actual or potential) ban on such links has been interpreted as applying to talk and project pages as well, it would suppress the ability to cite content in such sites when discussing potential legal threats to Wikipedia, and the like, which are being discussed there. But I suppose we can just all put our heads in the sand and pretend they don't exist.