On Apr 8, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Ron Ritzman wrote:
If it is necessary to treat certain controversial sock
prone AFDs this
way then a policy needs to be adopted covering it, who can invoke
"special rules", under what circumstances, and what qualifies an
account to "vote" when the rule is invoked. This is so it doesn't look
like the nominator is pulling rules out of his ass. If I am not
mistaken, users have been warned in the past about making up their own
policies.
Dreadful idea. There's no way to close an AfD like this to
everybody's satisfaction. I'd rather the thing that pisses people off
be a well-reasoned human than an arbitrary set of rules.
-Phil