----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Haws brian@bhaws.com
The difference is that WR encourages and promotes the investigation and publication of personal information regarding Wikipedia editors. For that reasoon, if for no other, is why linking should be banned...
I know they do that, but it doesn't follow that they should be banned because of it. Sometimes Wikipedia Review might wind up being a source for other information that's used in a Wikipedia article. Banning them as a source simply because we don't _like_ them is ridiculous. Should we ban whitehouse.gov as a source because we may disagree vehemently with the behavior of the administration there?
NPOV is a foundation policy. There are no exemptions for issues that affect Wikipedia directly.