On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:38:04 -0500, Erica fangaili@gmail.com wrote:
Take the information for what you will. I am not sure I accomplished anything other than reasserting what we already know. But it was an interesting experiment.
Yes, it was interesting. It's reinforced my view that timed protection is a good idea, in that we will effectively do this same study serially for new protected articles, and it shows that semiprotection is a very useful tool in helping to maintain a balance between editability and usefulness. Thank you for doing this, and doing the work monitoring the articles, and sharing the results.
Guy (JzG)