On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:54:52 +0100, "James Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In which case, we'd better remove it. Just in case
we get sued.
Oh sure. And we'd better remove the articles on any books because
they use the book title in its entirety, yes? Or we could be perhaps
just a tad more realistic and recognise the difference between
reproducing all of the Cool Wall in the Cool Wall article, and
reproducing the precursor and successor in an article on a pop single.
Mind you, it is possible that *would* turn out to violate fair use,
but it's less likely than, say, a list of all the top ten singles,
which is what the chart company was complaining about.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG