On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:41:59 +0100, "James Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So it *is* OK to have a thousand and something articles
that all state
"this song was number one in the UK from (x) to (y)", but it *is not*
OK to have a single article listing them all in chronological order?
According to the rights owner, yes.
And if that is the case, how does the succession box
fit in?
Probably shows too few at once to be a big deal. I suspect their
concern is their ability to sell for profit books detailing the
chronology of the charts. But that's only a guess.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG