On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 01:46:12 -0700, "Matthew
Brown" <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
With the exception of fair use, of course - which
is in fact more
useful AND more defensible in text than in pictures. (For UK
contributors, of course, replace that with 'fair dealing' which is
much more restrictive, but I believe DOES still allow for criticism
and commentary - though someone better versed in it would be useful)
Indeed. So some examples would be fine, and a discussion of the
process would be fine. I am completely behind both. What is not
fine, in any case I can think of, is reproducing the content *in its
entirety* as part of that.
The Cool Wall is only a small portion of the show, as is my
understanding, and there's more to it than simply the name of the car
that winds up on the board. It is ridiculous to claim that including a
listing of cars that have been on it is reproducing the show *in its
entirety*. You're stretching really hard here.