On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:18:17 +0100, "David
Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This appears to be the sort of obsession with
replacing editorial
judgement with rules that makes Wikipedia into a red tape obstacle
course.
Yup. Sadly, without rules like that, the editors who self-evidently
lack Clue will fight tooth and nail to keep crap, on the grounds that
there is no policy which says it must go.
I think it's more likely that they disagree with the premise that it
actually _is_ crap. And they very well might be right since labeling
something "crap" can be highly subjective. Assume good faith, please.