Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:44:17 -0400, Phil Sandifer
<Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No. I want to be able to write good, usable
articles on important
topics in a manner unencumbered by pointless and onerous requirements
designed to keep idiots from breaking Wikipedia.
I which case discussing NOR in the context of something the BBC Top
Gear team don't think is even worth putting on their website is
probably a waste of your time :-)
Guy (JzG)
Having followed this thread, I have to voice some frustration with your
tactics, Guy. At one point you argue strongly that it's a copyvio. At
the next moment that it's OR. And you seem to slip back and forth as is
convenient for your argument. When someone makes a point in support of
it not being a copyvio, you bring out the OR defense. And when someone
makes a point about it not being OR, you bring out the copyvio defense.
As I say, this leaves me frustrated. Not because I necessarily agree or
disagree with any particular position, but because the conversation does
not seem to be headed toward any conclusion.
-Rich