The Arbitration Committee's overriding aim is not
fairness. Rather it
is to do the best for the encyclopaedia. This doesn't mean that
fairness is not considered. It just means that, when "justice" and
the interests of the encylopaedia collide, the encyclopaedia comes
first.
Sam
I understand that. But topic banning an editor whose edits on that topic
were desribed by the arbcom as "generally responsible" and without diffs
that show disruptive editing on that topic is neither fair nor does it
help the encyclopedia.
I will continue editing at Citizendium.
Andries