On 01/04/07, Ron Ritzman <ritzman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/1/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Don't remove information you believe to be
true from Wikipedia even
> if it is unsourced. This is a central tenet of sourcing that needs to
> be preserved in order to keep sourcing from becoming a bludgeon to
> gut articles for POV or other churlish reasons.
Following AGF, I would agree with you somewhat on just
about
everything, except articles about people who are still converting
oxygen into CO2. Incorrect but plausible sounding information can hurt
people in real life. It needs a source even if it's something you
"just know" is correct.
Living bios are an exception - we have good reason to be really
hard-arsed on sourcing and content for those.
- d.