On 23/09/06, David Alexander Russell webmaster@davidarussell.co.uk wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
If it's third-party verifiable, why not? (note: many people become AFD regulars just to enforce their disagreement with this notion.)
Well, now that it seems that it is possible to enforce one's bias simply by overruling your opponents when closing an AFD (rather than convicing others to support your point of view) why do they bother?
It's possible to do all sorts of things; whether they do is another matter, of course.
- d.