On 13/09/06, Akash Mehta draicone@gmail.com wrote:
I think we first need to finetune the quality of such articles. Sure, for every TV show, wikipedia has an article. But many (if not most) articles are stubs, they are subject to vandalism and lack references. First we need to bring them up to, say, good article status.
The infrastructure for the printed wikireaders described here is a separate issue from the article content - there's no reason to wait on it.
I think having a printed copy of an article to hand will show its flaws quite glaringly and lead to improved articles directly ;-) It will be particularly nice if this is per-category.
- d.