On 9/13/06, Carl Peterson
<carlopeterson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What would be ideal is if we could establish a
content-area (i.e.,
WikiProject) peer review as a prerequisite for the purposes of
content (esp.
for technical articles) then have it go to a "Brilliant Prose
Committee" of
qualified persons (e.g., people with actual degrees or a lot of
experience)
to evaluate the writing style, the readibility, the grammar, etc.
But that
borders on instruction creep and would be strongly opposed as it
creates an
elite class distinction and would knock out all the lovely people
who derive
meaning in life from firing torpedoes at FACs.
Carl
You have suggested a committee. Generaly that isn't a good sign.
It's easy to neutralise this suggestion:
suggest a committee to discuss whether to have a committee.