David Gerard wrote:
On 12/09/06, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/12/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia is not popual due to it's FAs and GAs. It's popular becuase of it's good enough articles.
True. But being respectable is not really the same thing as being popular; and I was under the impression that the former was a more practical concern for us than the latter.
Fairly obviously, our real popularity comes from the social networking possibilities of our userboxes.
Oh sorry, they were last year's thing. What's this year's? I forget.
Worshipping process.