On 09/09/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com>
wrote:
> gee, if a person gets that many warnings,
and doesn't respond, and keeps
> up the bad behavior, then an indef ban is certainly justified.
The problem is that normaly they do a load of
uploads then go away so
there is little point in blocking them.
If we're getting a string of these hit and upload burst people, some
checkusering *may* be in order (I don't *know*, but it might be) to
see if they're repeat offenders. Remembering that the recentchanges
table only goes back a limited time (one to four weeks on dev whim and
system resources). So if you have a string of recent hit-and-run anon
uploaders, please leave a list of usernames on WP:RFCU with a note
that I suggested checking for persistent offenders might be in order -
insisting on dropping us in the copyright poo is not nice or suitable
behaviour.
- d.
No it appears to mostly be companies advertiseing themselves or people
creating a small number of articles with lots of pics.
--
geni