-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
.. and they're going to spam our e-mail
queue:
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/09/wikipedia_youre_on_notice.html
It would be nice to get some evolutionary biologists to review our
entries on the respective topics systematically. I suspect there's
probably a lot of creationist POV creep already.
It would also be nice to get some
creationists to review our entries on
Creatonism and Intelligent Design systematically; I suspect there's a
lot of evolutionist POV creep.
It would also be nice to get some Ptolemaist scholars to review our
entries on gravitation and the solar system systematically; I suspect
there's a lot of Galilean POV creep.
Seriously though, legitimate POV disputes are one thing ... but when one
side has all of the science behind it and the other side has nothing
behind it, giving equal weight is fallacious. Our articles on the shape
of the Earth, global warming, what caused 9/11, and HIV causing AIDS are
similarly reality-based.
- --
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")
I suspect his suggestion was review of what we say about them. A
group so unpopular that they are characterized as they have been on this
thread probably has some legitimate concerns about being misrepresented.
SKL